This concept must have the aim to promote the performance of online retailers and to strengthen the position of the buyer through enhanced transparency of the supplying dealer. “As key words of such a concept be mentioned here: uniform imprint, uniform right of withdrawal or return policy for consumer, universally applicable general terms and conditions for online merchants, until by mass Abmahner.” “Currently, warnings of mass abmahnern, which exploit the ignorance of in particular merchant and are attacking the current regulations of the revocation notice, threaten again the the theme of a deterioration” concern. PAL further: it is a unilateral perspective, if one follows the currently existing and partially completely exaggerated consumer protection. Because the existing perspective of politics collides with the basic action of a functioning shipping trade. Which the consumer accepted the ordering mode over the Internet who should selloff in Internet be realized at the latest according to the source the policy.
If high-performance servers are sometimes overloaded by users and be paralyzed the legislature in his current court opinions, which he used in the various disputes, occasional purchases can”talk about the Internet and impose regulations that harm only the online retailer. The shipping trade is this as frivolous”from the outset stamped as the consumer binds him to rules imposed on only the online retailer. “The consumer perceives a balance, the existing consumer protection as a collective legal certainty” is considered. So among other things the ruling of the OLG Hamburg is AZ. 5 W 15/07, that forbids non-free packages, an online retailer to refuse to accept, construed as an obligation of the assumption. The nonfree package which will be sent to the merchant by the consumer when exercising the right of withdrawal, the dealer 12,00 costs, will not be considered here. Only a commitment to fill the return slip sent with and use is simply being overlooked.