For Warren Buffet, to rescue to the investment bank Bear Stearns was the correct decision. The American Federal Reserve injected to that financial organization million to him dollars to contain the financial crisis. Nevertheless, the richest man of the planet assures that the problem is of the banks, are the one who are the guilty and is not necessary to lie down it to anybody more. The industralist of 78 years considers that the slips of the American investment banks will take more to regulated stricter a financial norm and in the future. Also he speaks on the fiscal reductions of the great fortunes: My employees pay to a 33% of their rent and I, without advisers neither fiscal planning nor paradises, limiting to do what the Congress dictates to me, 17% . This tendency extends by the world.
In the last years, the benefits of the great companies have increased in a 70%, while the real pays of the workers are handicapped in a 4%. The images that the Katrina Hurricane left years ago reflect the injustice distributive, in some rich countries that they embrace the liberal cause but does not even apply in the days of crisis to maintain it their gains. In Spain, the speculators demand to the government rescues who them in the days of crisis, sometimes with the argument of which hundreds of thousands of uses will be lost if they do not do it. Thus they have done it many real estate ones that now is in bankruptcy. But the responsibility of the Governments is more in to have maintained political lax with the banks, that almost financed houses in their totality without knowing what they were buying, but knowing that many people were insolvent. The benefits lasted what they lasted with the complicity of the real estate ones that saw their pockets grow.
Private providence x Direct Treasure Is of utmost importance that all plan its retirements in advance. Some will only have the public welfare and others will have conditions to make a complementary, private providence. This article aims at to bring our vision on the advantages and cons of if making a private providence or keeping the resources in the direct treasure a complementary retirement. Private providence Exists of the types of private providence: PGBL and VGBL. PGBL means Plan Generating of Free Benefit and VGBL wants to say Generating Life of Free Benefit.
They are plain previdencirios that allow that you accumulate resources for a contracted stated period. During this period, the deposited money goes being invested and rentabilizado for the insuring one chosen for you. They are the two phases? Period of investment: In this period they are made it arrives in port initial and the monthly load. Period of Benefit: In this period the user usufrue of the plan, receiving the value waked up for the waked up period. Tax of Shipment and Administration the shipment tax is defined in percentile terms and happens on all the contributions that you to effect to a providence plan. While the administration tax has as objective to compensate the manager for its work being managed the resources of the deep one, the shipment tax searchs to compensate the financial institution for its expenditures with brokerage and sales of the plan. Difference between PGBL and VGBL the main difference between them is in the taxation. In the PGBL, you it can deduce the value of the contributions of its taxable income of the Income tax, with limit of 12% of its annual gross income. Thus, it will be able to reduce the value of the tax to pay or to increase its restitution TO GO. Indicated for who it makes complete declaration TO GO.
In the educational scope it was not different. However, the democratization desire was to the little abandoned one and substituted for quality yearnings, having this a happened conception of the enterprise world and reflecting the interests of the ruling class, after all, a democratization does not correspond to the characteristics of the capitalism. The world of the businesses if became reference for all the actions of the man; everything turns around the logic of the market, that said the rules of the game thus the ruling class dominates each time more and believes that the quality of the professional reflects in the product quality, thus reflecting in the amount of the profit. As Snows (2007) the education proposal neoliberal is the proposal of the Brazilian bourgeoisie and its allies. This proposal, formulated and stimulated technique and financially for the international organisms for the underdeveloped countries … …
the pertaining to school education, in all the levels and modalities of education, starts to have as purposes to spread out and to sediment, enters the current and future generations, the enterprise culture, what it means to eticamente conform them technique and eticamente to the occured qualitative changes in world-wide level in the social relations of capitalist production … … the pertaining to school education if would destine, then, to prepare for the simple work and the complex work to give account of the biggest scientific rationality required by the current period of training of organization of the work … With regard to the education of quality, such perspective understands as something that must be granted who will have half to assure it, not as right of all. … The great strategical operation of the neoliberalismo consists of transferring to the education of the sphere of the politics to the sphere of the market, thus questioning its character of right and reducing it its condition of property.