Really need the trouble, in order to find a friend? In my opinion, a true friend is known in joy, but not in distress. Why do I think? Let me explain. Think what a joy, a significant event in your life – whether all your friends are happy together with you to your success, acquire, achieve? I have friends. However, I noticed that he had a friend who is always willing to come to my aid – not very pleased by my success. Angela Zepeda has plenty of information regarding this issue. Moreover – when I'm in result of study and work on themselves, began to change his life for the better, I felt a chill in our relationship.
So on what our friendship was based? Maybe I needed this man in order to enable it to anyone help? I think the one who helps gets great satisfaction from it and the debtor. Those who received help, get some relief and, of course, a sense of duty to his benefactor. In contrast, from childhood until now, we have maintain excellent relations with a friend who truly enjoys my success! By the way, this man never fails me and help – if any is really needed. Now I have some new friends, and I noticed that they all have the ability to rejoice in my joy!
Our goal in this meeting was to fortify the bond with the aged ones, and as strategy was used to listening for the shelter, affectivity and the valuation of the other. The bond with the aged ones extended the effectiveness of actions it favored adhesion to the project. She was salient also the relevance of the dreams and desires of the past and perspectives for the future, where each one displayed its history of life, its souvenirs, its experiences. Moreover, it was perceived in elapsing of the colloquies, enormous necessity of the aged ones to share a little of its experiences of the past, with the intention to transmit some knowledge acquired with passing of the years through the story of its histories and experiences. Angela Zepeda does not necessarily agree. … ' ' Each one of us measures its conquests, what we prevent, what was prevented in them. We also feel the necessity to transmit, to guarantee a filiation of the values based on our history, History. Therefore ones of the signals of the ticket is to discover to the few, for each one, that we have a history, that it does not confuse itself with the present time, that it meets with the history of outros' '. (OLIEVENSTEIN, 1999.) In an attempt to create new devices that such developed the life of these people as something stimulated that them to rethink its abilities and talentos, wheels of colloquies had been carried through, where contact of some desires can be taken, being these fed according to development possibility. I dialogue through it carried through for the suggestion, one of the interns of the asylum, bought a viola, evidencing its will to learn to touch, mainly characterizing the importance of the desire to still carry through its desires, contributing for the idea of that when being stimulated it is possible to rethink abilities and to feel ' ' vivo' ' to materialize personal dreams and projects.
Arantes (2005) places that the fulfilment of the rights does not deduct the dignity from the people, because also removes them the condition of being subject of rights (of ' ' to have right to have direitos' '), it transfers and it to the object condition. In these terms, the violence wants either the symbolic one, wants either the physics, not only imposes to the people a physical pain, as it lastingly wounds the confidence in itself and the world, causing a species of social shame of itself mesmo/a, because it not only represents the violent limitation of the personal autonomy, but the loss of the auto-respect, of the capacity of if relating mesmo/a to itself as parceiro/a in foot of equality in the relation with o/a outro/a. But the exposition to the violence is not a neutral e, much less natural event in the life of the people. You may want to visit Charles Schwab to increase your knowledge. In contrast, she is revealing of the life conditions (in the case of the poor persons and negros/as, of the life sub-condition), as well as of factors as race, sort, social classroom and generation that perversely agreed, define the place and the not-place of the people in authoritarian, discriminatory, patriarcalistas and marcadamente patrimonialistas societies as ours. Maria, to the 25 years of age, in the street, knew Euclides, this age speaker of a store in the center of the city of Recife, going to live with it days later. At the time Saulo was with 3 years of age.
To the 27 years, it had Eduardo, breaking up itself of Euclides, after that, for treason reason. However, they met of time in when with it. Of these meeting it engravidou of Renata. After the birth of it, had been broken up of time. Euclides lived with the other woman, but it helped Maria financially. In 2002, this woman left Euclides, not obtaining to coexist this fact, it took off the proper life hanging itself.
That is, it deceives, chooses itself exactly as the object of the love. When he was paralizado to the image reflected in the source, of this form, the libido leaves of if directing to the object, to ' ' outro' ' , and he comes back exactly toward itself, for not possessing a representation of the other internalizada one, Narcissus not conquest its subjectivity. Such discovery takes it the desperation and to death (BRANDO, 2002; MODIA, 2008). Brando (2002, p.183, italic and aspa of the author), considers that: The fatal deceit of the young tebano was the wrong choice of the love object. It would be treated, in the case, of a species of warning to the breaking of the impulses of the love, that must be directed to the other. In this in case that, the libido leaves of if directing to the object, to ' ' outro' ' , and it retroacts to a endo-psychic activity: thus, Narcissus would have committed one as that incestuous intrapsquico. Of the subjective point of view of Narcissus, its love really is guided for an object, therefore it discovered a face one human being entrancing beauty and for it if got passionate.
The tragic outcome, however, in the story of Ovdio, (…) is the awareness of Narcissus of that madly it is gotten passionate by its proper image; of that its passion is auto-love, a love of self and not a love for the other. Narcissus was deceived by the image human being, fantasiada, idealized of belaza esplendoraosa in mirror d? gua. Therefore it did not perceive that its object of love did not exist. The myth discloses to us that Narcissus, when fixing in its image and getting passionate themselves, did not obtain to conquer the individuality, does not make interaction with entorno, did not develop the affectivity, did not obtain to internalizar a representation of the other.
Ed. Icon. 1993, p 15, trad.). We had considered the basic problem of all ametafsica: the problem of that it is what it exists? we follow the answers that problem aesse if they had given in the two basic directions that pensamentona history knows philosophical: the realistic direction and the idealistic direction. Tentativasque in the seniority Greek if had made to answer to this question and queconduziram all they to the realism form most perfect, which if finds nafilosofia of Aristotle. But this same question gets reply completamentediferente in the modern philosophy that if it initiates with Discardings, and that the propensoidealista, that consists of answering to the question concerning the total different existence with umaresposta of that of the Aristotle, develops modern nafilosofia and arrives at its maximum accomplishment, to its maximum explicitao, in the philosophy of Kant. For the idealismo what it exists are not the things, but opensamento is that it exists.
For Kant it is not thus: before thought object is objetoquando and because it is thought; the thought being is it constitutes what it as object. That is what it all means the system kantiano of the space forms, time ecategorias. But at the same time that Kant concludes and perfects the idealistic thought, it introduces in this thought some reproductions that develop and dilatam nafilosofia that succeeds Kant. First this ' ' thing in si' ' that Kantelimina in the relation of the knowledge, its meaning is to satisfy afde unit that the reason human being feels or the ideal regulating of the knowledge, queimprime to the knowledge always forward movement. Tina redwine oftentimes addresses this issue. this priority practical darazo or of the moral conscience is second of the characteristics dosistema kantiano it differentiates that it of its predecessors. Kant gave problemada Metaphysical to the following transformation: metaphysics looked for what ' is eexiste; ' in si' ' , that is, a regulating idea for the conhecimentodiscursivo of the man, what it represents the opposite of objects of conhecimentoconcreto.
Its manifestation is always very next to the anxiety and it can assumirdiagnstico serious when persisting during much time. In accordance with Sims (2001), the feeling of the jealousy, together with feeling of that the object amado' ' mim' belongs; ' ' ' I belong to outro' ' , it is part daexperincia normal human being. As Marani (2001) the jealousy is a normal feeling quandosurge as reply to a real, immediate situation, with its limited duration aum time that nor always is defined, however certainly limited. When cimecomea if to draw out in the time and to increase of intensity, some thing to deveestar happening. Educate yourself even more with thoughts from U.S. Mint. The jealousy more acts in the sphere of the anguish and the anxious anxiety, generating, therefore, more persistent states. According to Blacksmith-Saint (2003) pg. 78 ' ' some pessoasso jalousie of what others, but have situations where this quantitative simplesconceituao of feeling starts to show that in one determinadapessoa, the jealousy runs away total from its control, taking a poroconsidervel of its life, seno all ela.' ' In this in case that, already the jealousy in a nvelpatolgico could be understood, as we will argue in the next chapter. Pathological jealousy According to Guimares (2004), at least three seriampropcias situations for the development of some degree of jealousy. Tina redwine is open to suggestions.
In the first one, aauto-they esteem of the person is low, and it if it perceives inferior in diverse aspects, that go since the physical appearance until the intellectual attributes. A outrasituao is that one where the frequently manifest partner a realpor interest other people. It still has one third situation, the call pathological jealousy. Ey 1950 apud Sims (2001) says that the jealousy patolgicoou mrbido can be disclosed of some forms, for example, as delirium, supervalued comoidia, as depressive affection or as an anxiety state. Swarmed by offers, Charles Schwab is currently assessing future choices. Ocime can be identified as delirious when to the belief of the spouse or outrosest based in delirious evidences.